Friday, July 19, 2013

York to London rail times to be cut in investment boost

York to London rail times to be cut in investment boost

MORE than ?1 billion of investment in rail services across the country will mean new, faster, more reliable services on the East Coast Main Line.

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin confirmed today a ?1.2 billion order for more state-of-the-art trains to transform rail travel on Britain?s busiest intercity routes.

The deal will see 270 new carriages rolled out by 2019 in a deal which includes many new trains for the East Coast Main Line by 2018, and has been welcomed by leaders in York.

Hugh Bayley, MP for York Central, strongly supported the decision, saying: ?The East Coast Main Line is a crucial artery that pumps economic growth in our region.

?We want ever-improving service for the East Coast Main Line both for businesses in the region and leisure travellers and I want the Government to stick to its HS2 plans to build even faster railways to London and Yorkshire and to continue as currently agreed with East Coast Main Line at York so we can benefit.?

The 30 new trains, to be built in the UK, will increase capacity on the East Coast Main Line from 530 seats to 627 seats (18 per cent), make trains five times more reliable, and reduce journey times between York and London Kings Cross by nine minutes, the Government claim.

They will be a mix of electric-only and hybrid variants of the class 800 series, which allows them to operate on both electrified and non-electrified routes at speeds of up to 140 miles per hour.

Patrick McLoughlin, Transport Secretary, said: ?This new order for class 800 series trains is part of the government?s commitment to invest in our nation?s infrastructure.

?This will not only deliver significant benefits to passengers by further slashing journey times and bolstering capacity, but will also stimulate economic growth through improved connectivity between some of Britain?s biggest cities. This is good news for rail passengers and for British manufacturing.?

Source: http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/10558480.York_to_London_rail_times_to_be_cut_in_investment_boost/?ref=rss

erin andrews erin andrews Magic Mike Anderson Cooper Gay NBA draft 2012 alicia sacramone Don Grady

Halfbrick wants to watch it all burn with Colossatron: Massive World Threat

DNP

The makers of Jetpack Joyride and Fruit Ninja want you to destroy the planet. From the halls of the first annual PAX Australia comes Colossatron: Massive World Threat. Sure, the game's whole mass-destruction-via-aliens concept sounds a lot like Rampage, but as the announcement trailer shows, it's oh so much more. Players take control of a modular robotic snake, using all manner of upgradeable weapons and abilities to wreak wanton top-down chaos on an unsuspecting populace. The goal? Causing as much property damage as possible. Think of it as a modern take on Godzilla with a campy anime slant and you're mostly there. The Queensland, Australia developer's latest will be playable at its booth for the duration of the show. Can't make it to the expo? Skip past the break for the debut video.

Filed under:

Comments

Source: Halfbrick (Facebook)

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/19/halfbrick-colossatron-massive-world-threat/?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget

viktor bout ncaa hockey role models ferdinand porsche gregg williams theraflu joe avezzano

Bank of Canada lays out conditions for steady rates

By Randall Palmer and Louise Egan

OTTAWA (Reuters) - The Bank of Canada said on Wednesday it will hold its benchmark interest rate steady at 1 percent while the economy remains fragile and inflation stays low, but that it sees rates rising if the economy performs in line with expectations.

The policy announcement, the first under new Governor Stephen Poloz, delivered roughly the same message as those of his predecessor, Mark Carney, over the past year: The next move is a rate hike, not a cut, although it won't be any time soon.

Still, Poloz, who took over at the helm of the central bank in June, was more explicit in stating that the continuation of steady rates depended on three key trends.

"As long as there is significant slack in the Canadian economy, the inflation outlook remains muted, and imbalances in the household sector continue to evolve constructively, the considerable monetary policy stimulus currently in place will remain appropriate," Poloz said at a news conference to announce the bank's decision.

"Over time, as the normalization of these conditions unfolds, a gradual normalization of policy interest rates can also be expected, consistent with achieving the 2 percent inflation target."

But he downplayed the so-called hawkish bias in the statement and made it clear any move was still far in the future.

"We never saw that as some sort of signal that we were on an imminent tightening phase or anything like that," he said. "Rather it was to help people understand that these are not normal times. So you need to be more prepared for a gradual return to normality."

Canada's export-reliant economy has struggled to stay on a growth track after a relatively speedy recovery from the world economic crisis. Inflationary pressures remain muted.

The bank did not provide specific thresholds that could trigger a rate increase.

Poloz listed an array of factors the bank would watch, including more U.S. and global growth momentum, but said it would mostly be a judgment call by the bank.

His comments came as Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the U.S. central bank still planned to start scaling back its massive bond purchase program later this year, but it could change those plans if the outlook shifted.

Poloz said Bernanke's recent remarks on the so-called tapering of the Fed's stimulus measures were helpful.

"Markets are learning from that, as are we," he said.

CAUTIOUS

Following the decision and the new governor's comments, traders slightly bid up the price of shorter-term bonds, sending yields lower, showing there was little concern the central bank would rush to boost interest rates.

"They tweaked - very, very slightly - the eventual tightening bias, but not in any meaningful way, I don't think," said Mark Chandler, head of fixed income and currency strategy at the Royal Bank of Canada.

"Overall, I think it was quite cautious. I'd hate to paint it specifically dovish or hawkish."

The Canadian dollar weakened to a session low against the U.S. dollar after the statement, sliding to C$1.0445 versus the greenback, or 95.74 U.S. cents. But it quickly regained most of the lost ground.

The central bank has held its overnight rate at 1 percent since September 2010, the longest period between rate changes since the 1950s. Since April 2012, it has been hinting at rate hikes to come, making it the only central bank in the Group of Seven major economies to have a hawkish bias, albeit a mild one.

Market players don't expect a move until the fourth quarter of 2014.

FLOODS, STRIKE HIT QUARTER

The bank cut its forecast for second-quarter growth sharply - to 1 percent from 1.8 percent - largely due to the impact of catastrophic flooding in Alberta and a strike by construction workers in Quebec. But it said third-quarter growth would more than compensate for that decline. It forecast third-quarter growth of 3.8 percent, up from its previous estimate of 2.3 percent.

That meant the volatility of the two quarters would not play into its policy choices.

The bank said the economy would grow 1.8 percent this year, up from its previous estimate of 1.5 percent. It expected growth of 2.7 percent each year in 2014 and 2015. The 2014 forecast was lowered from the 2.8 percent previously estimated.

The overall growth outlook is little changed from its April forecast, and the bank sees a return to full capacity and inflation rising to its 2 percent target by mid-2015.

On Canada's once-hot housing market, Poloz did not rule out a rebound even after signs of cooling earlier this year. Household debt has eased but could also pick up again, he said.

"As I read the situation right now, the new data that we have from the housing sector is just as consistent with a soft landing as they might be with a rebound," he said.

While past statements have referred to the "persistent strength of the Canadian dollar," the currency has weakened in recent weeks and the bank avoided the phrase.

"In general, we would prefer not to offer a running commentary on the dollar in any case," Poloz said.

(Editing by Janet Guttsman, Jeffrey Hodgson and Bernadette Baum)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/bank-canada-pledges-steady-rates-under-explicit-conditions-140346281.html

2016 Olympics TD Bank mountain lion hanley ramirez Christian Bale visits victims Christian Bale Sherman Hemsley

The Eye of Sauron Is the Modern Surveillance State

Eye of Sauron, Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.

The Eye of Sauron, here in the film Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.

Courtesy of New Line Cinema

What can literary fiction teach us about recent revelations that the National Security Agency has aggressively been gathering massive amounts of data on American citizens? The novel one usually turns to, of course, is George Orwell?s Nineteen Eighty-Four, with its terrifying vision of the Thought Police. Even President Obama, in response to questions about the NSA, has been forced to deny that the government has engaged in ?Big Brother? tactics. Orwell?s book, however, isn?t the most compelling or accurate literary prediction of modern surveillance. That award goes to a less obvious title: J.R.R?Tolkien?s Lord of the Rings.

Tolkien?s most potent and intimidating image of centralized surveillance, the Eye of Sauron atop a tower, taking in the whole world, has resonated with those who are paranoid about government monitoring. But it?s Sauron?s vulnerability that has the most relevance for America today. Consider the basic premise of Tolkien?s trilogy: a small group of dedicated subversives willing to sacrifice their lives slips in under the surveillance system of a great power, blends in with an alien population, and delivers a devastating blow to the heart of its empire, leaving its security forces in disarray and its populace terrified. Even a tower or two crumbles to dust. Far from being covert, much of this operation is conducted in plain sight, with the great power aware of its enemies? existence, if not their intent. Given its prescience about modern-day terrorism, Tolkien?s vision offers at least three lessons for present-day America.

1. All-Seeing Is Not All-Knowing

The most salient fact about Tolkien is not that he was a fantasist, but that he was Catholic: His Christian beliefs drove him out of realism and into a world of orcs, ents, and Dark Lords. That?s why The Lord of the Rings has been dismissed, as Edmund Wilson put it soon after the book?s publication in 1954, as ?a children?s book which has some how got out of hand.? Yet the world he created allowed Tolkien to address problems that conventional realism had seemingly abandoned. The most important of them was the distinction between omnipotence and omniscience. In Orwell?s work (as well as that of other dystopian writers like Aldous Huxley and Yevgeny Zamyatin) those two terms are nearly synonymous: The Thought Police always know what Winston Smith is up to. But for a believer like Tolkien, only God can know everything. And in Sauron, Tolkien is able to imagine a figure of godlike power and seemingly infinite resources, but crippling interpretive fallibility.

Sauron?s main problem, in a nutshell, is a lack of empathy: He is unable to conceive of anyone possessing a set of values fundamentally different from his own. For Sauron, power?embodied by the one ring?is self-evidently a good in itself. Therefore anyone who possesses the ring will attempt to use it and thus fall into his clutches. The thought that someone might choose instead to destroy the ring (and possibly destroy himself in the process) never crosses Sauron?s mind. He suffers from a crippling case of ?confirmation bias??a fundamental problem for every intelligence agency. We see the things we want to see, which is a problem when one?s enemies have worldviews utterly different from one?s own.

2. The Enemy Controls the Plot

Tolkien?s second lesson for us: Surveillance is typically reactive. Intelligence professionals try to anticipate and counter the actions of their opponents; this leaves them on the defensive. For all our justifiable fears of the ?watchers,? the advantage is often on the side of the watched. Every act of surveillance entails a struggle over meaning, narrative, and plot, with the infiltrator often creating the story in a way that exploits the surveillance mechanism?s weaknesses. In The Lord of the Rings, determined individuals (Frodo, Gandalf) with an adequate understanding of the enemy?s blind spots are able to rebel in plain sight.

This isn?t to say, however, that Tolkien was naive about the very real abuses of totalitarian power. Quite the opposite: He was every bit as repelled by the KGB and the Gestapo as Orwell or Arthur Koestler. In this respect, the most interesting sections of LOTR are the final chapter of Book IV and the first of Book VI. This is the sequence in which Frodo and Sam slip past ?Homeland Security,? as it were, and evade the vast security apparatus on the borders of Mordor.

It is here that we get Tolkien?s canniest depiction of Mordor?s workaday employees: the orcs?Sauron?s TSA agents, to continue the metaphor. Here is a conversation Sam overhears between two of them about Frodo, who has been captured:

?What is it, d?you think? Elvish it looked to me, but undersized. What?s the danger in a thing like that??

?Don?t know till we?ve had a look.?

?Oho! So they haven?t told you what to expect? They don?t tell us all they know, do they? Not by half. But they can make mistakes, even the Top Ones can.?

?Sh! ... They may, but they?ve got eyes and ears everywhere; some among my lot, as like ? as not. But there?s no doubt about it, they?re troubled about something. ? Something nearly slipped.?

Isn?t this a more convincing depiction than Orwell?s hyperefficient Thought Police (or Zamyatin?s Guardians) of how power actually works in a surveillance state? Without in any way shorting the terror of living under the secret police, Tolkien captures the way that power mistrusts its own agents, and how it deprives them of information. He captures both the cynicism and paranoia of surveillance work?and also how, in this mix of suspicion, disgruntlement, and incompetence, things do slip through. The security apparatus, of Mordor or the United States, is only as strong as its weakest link, and weak links abound.

3. The Louder the Noise, the Fainter the Signal

As a common saying in the intelligence community would have it, processing raw intel is like drinking from a fire hose. Most dystopian authors cheat their way around this problem, ignoring huge swathes of the population to get the volume of information down to garden-hose levels. Huxley lops off ?eight ninths? of the populace through eugenics. Orwell imagines the proles?85 percent of Oceania?to be politically neutered and not worth watching. By contrast, Sauron, like the NSA, has no such luxury. As Tolkien understands, nothing is harder to parse than visible anonymity. And that is the state Frodo and Sam remain in, so long as they don?t wear the ring.

How to recognize the treacherous or psychopathic needle in the haystack? As recent months have proved, it?s not so easy. Our surveillance state, in contrast to Orwell?s, has had its share of failures. A dangerous assumption underlies many contemporary debates about government surveillance: the assumption of interpretive competence. Without diminishing the seriousness of the recent NSA revelations, Tolkien is finally more convincing about why total surveillance often fails than Orwell and his endless progeny are in imagining its inevitable success. That?s at once some small comfort and reason for concern.

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/07/tolkien_v_orwell_who_understood_modern_surveillance_best.html

Meteor Russia jay z Oscar Pistorius Carnival Triumph charles barkley valentines valentines day

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

'For now, we mourn': Few answers after 19 killed in Arizona wildfire

Governor Jan Brewer says her heart is breaking over the unimaginable loss of the firefighters, and for their families, friends and community.

By Erin McClam and Ian Johnston, NBC News

Arizona authorities struggled for answers Monday after 19 highly trained firefighters were trapped and killed by a windblown wildfire ? a blaze the governor vowed to stop ?before it causes any more heartache.?

One day after the worst loss of life for an American fire department since Sept. 11, investigators said they had not figured out why the men were unable to retreat to a safe zone or otherwise survive the inferno.

?For now, we mourn,? Gov. Jan Brewer said.

The fire, sparked by lightning on Friday, raged uncontrolled for a fourth day. By afternoon it had destroyed more than 200 buildings in Yarnell, a town of about 700 people northwest of Phoenix. It was described as at least 13 square miles and ?zero percent? contained, though more than 400 firefighters were trying.

The wildfire claimed all but one member of the Granite Mountain Hotshots, a team of elite firefighters known for extensive training and a demanding fitness regimen. Officials said only that the survivor might have been repositioning equipment.

Wade Ward, the public information officer for the Prescott Fire Department in Arizona, talks about the tragic loss of 19 firefighters in a massive wildfire, saying "it had to be the perfect storm in order for this to happen."

?We can honor their service with our gratitude and prayers,? Brewer said, ?and through our steadfast dedication to do whatever is necessary to bring this fire under control before it causes any more heartache.?

Mary Rasmussen, a spokeswoman for Prescott National Forest, said it appeared the 19 were engaged in a ?direct attack? ? getting close to the fire and trying to create a break to starve it of fuel.

She described the maneuver as ?one foot in the black and one foot in the green,? and said it was only done when the flames were 5 feet high or less: ?They?re right up against it.?

The conditions Sunday were extreme, with unusual wind, she said, and authorities were checking what other factors might have contributed.

Temperatures soared into the 110s in Arizona over the weekend, and National Weather Service meteorologist Brian Klimowski told The Associated Press that there was a sudden increase and shift in the wind at about the time the men were lost Sunday afternoon.

Art Morrison, a state forestry spokesman, told The Associated Press that the men had been forced to deploy emergency fire shelters ? individual, portable cocoons meant to protect breathable air and shield them from the heat.

Tom Harbour, national fire director for the U.S. Forest Service, said the shelters had saved hundreds of lives over the years. But he said some fires are strong enough, and move quickly enough, to overwhelm them. The fire was the deadliest wildfire in the United States in 80 years.

From the few known details, he said it was not clear that anyone did anything wrong.

?It?s way, way too early to be drawing any conclusions,? said Harbour, who said he had not seen anything like this fire in his 44-year career. ?The only conclusion right now is that souls are dead and half the town of Yarnell is gone.?

David Kadlubowski / The Arizona Republic via AP

Nineteen firefighters - all members of an elite response team - were killed Sunday battling a fast-moving wildfire in Arizona, marking the deadliest single incident for firefighters since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, officials said.

Hotshot fire crews often hike into the wilderness lugging 40 or 50 pounds of equipment, including chain saws and other heavy gear, to clear brush and trees and anything else that might feed the flames.

The Granite Mountain crew had battled blazes in New Mexico and elsewhere in Arizona in recent weeks.

?If you ever met them, you would meet the finest, most dedicated people,? Prescott Fire Chief Dan Fraijo said. ?They?ll sleep out there as they try to develop fire lines and put protection between homes and natural resources and still try to remain safe.?

President Barack Obama, in a statement, described the fallen men as ?heroes,? and Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said it was ?as dark a day as I can remember.? Arizona Sen. John McCain said the men?s sacrifice would not be forgotten.

Authorities said they would release names of the dead later. Juliann Ashcraft told the website of The Arizona Republic and NBC affiliate KPNX that she and her four children were watching the news when they learned her husband, Andrew, was among the dead.

?They died heroes,? she said through tears. ?And we?ll miss them. We love them.?

?

Related:

This story was originally published on

Source: http://feeds.nbcnews.com/c/35002/f/663306/s/2e0eb428/l/0Lusnews0Bnbcnews0N0C0Inews0C20A130C0A70C0A10C192242790Efor0Enow0Ewe0Emourn0Efew0Eanswers0Eafter0E190Ekilled0Ein0Earizona0Ewildfire0Dlite/story01.htm

tom watson kawasaki disease resurrection masters tickets one direction tulsa news scalloped potatoes

Monday, July 1, 2013

So Did Nudging Work?

Cass Sunstein speaking at Harvard Law School. Cass Sunstein has championed the idea of "nudging" in public policy.

Courtesy of Matthew W. Hutchins/Harvard Law Record/Wikimedia Commons

Cass Sunstein, nudge inventor and former White House official, explains how his nudges have helped Americans save for retirement and eat better. He co-wrote the best-selling 2008 book Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness with Richard Thaler. His latest book Simpler: The Future of Government is about using behavioral science to transform government.

When you published Nudge in 2008, did you expect it to have so much influence?
No. We were trying to write the best book we could. I was surprised and gratified that it got such attention.

You went on to head up the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. What was the most effective nudge that you implemented?
Automatic enrollment in retirement savings plans has had a major effect. If you have to sign up, it's a bit of a bother. People procrastinate or go about other business. Then they have less money in retirement. With automatic enrollment, you're more likely to be comfortable when you retire.

How many U.S. citizens have been nudged that way?and do they know it?
A very large number. Automatic enrollment is a common practice now; many millions of people have benefited from it. People recognize they've been automatically enrolled?there's nothing secret about it, and it's explained by employers. But they wouldn't think, "I've been nudged."

Don't they have a right to know?
I don't think it's very important that people support the idea of nudging in the abstract. I think it's important that policies be helpful and sensible.

What other policies did you design during your time at OIRA?
In the United States, the principal icon for informing people about healthy food choices was known as the food pyramid. It was very confusing. We now have the food plate, which is more intelligible, and we believe it's leading to more informed choices.

We also had a situation in which poor children who were eligible for free meals weren't getting them because they had to enroll. We automatically enrolled them, and a lot of kids are now getting food who otherwise wouldn't.

How do you design a nudge?
It's a problem-centered approach, rather than a theory-centered approach. So if we had a problem of excess complexity making it hard for people to make informed choices, the solution would be to simplify. If people aren't enrolled in a program because it's a headache to sign up, automatic enrolment seems like a good idea.

Is nudging generally preferable to strategies like taxes and prohibition?
The advantage of a nudge is that it's more respectful of freedom of choice. It always belongs on the table, but if you have a situation where, say, polluters are causing health problems, some regulatory response is justified?a criminal sentence or a civil fine.

Can nudging solve complex, long-term problems such as climate change?
Climate change needs international efforts. You can make progress by informing people of greenhouse-gas emissions associated with their car, or through default rules, like lights going off when no one is in a room. But nudges are unlikely to be sufficient.

Can nudges lead to lasting change?
There is good research on the circumstances under which using social norms result in persistent instead of short-term behavioral change. With respect to energy use, so long as people are frequently reminded, it works.

How much further can nudging go?
I think it's important not to get too fixated on the word nudge. Part of the reason the book did well is that it has a catchy title, but I'd like to think the better reason is that it has solutions to problems. The use of these tools has produced terrific results in a short time?and we're at the tip of the iceberg.

This article originally appeared in New Scientist.

Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/new_scientist/2013/06/nudge_policy_cass_sunstein_on_automatic_enrollment_and_food_choices.html

atari breakout Amys Baking Company oj simpson chicago bulls ncis how i met your mother tesla

Mayor Bloomberg Says Minorities Are Not Stopped By Cops Enough (@MikeBloomberg)

Jun 30, 2013 | 7:30 AM??? Written By: Mike Hughes

Mayor Bloomberg has landed himself in hot waters after making some rather controversial remarks about minorities not being stopped enough by police compared to that of white individuals. ?Bloomberg stated on his weekly WOR-AM radio, that police "disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little." ?

Councilman Robert Jackson was highly displeased with Bloomberg's remarks, along with many others, and voice his opinion about the mayor's choice of words.

"Our mayor's comments prove he just doesn't get it." ?

How do you feel about the mayor's comments?

Source: bigstory.ap.org

Source: http://www.vladtv.com/blog/169293/mayor-bloomberg-says-minorities-are-not-stopped-by-cops-enough/

nancy pelosi gop debate republican debate lewis black kirkwood chris brown and rihanna nightline